LADWP Clinging To Old Model For Building Infrastructure: It’s Time For A Mindset Change

We continue to get letters opposing the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power’s proposed Southern Owens Valley Solar Ranch, a 1,200-acre solar energy generating facility that would be built adjacent to Manzanar National Historic Site, in California’s Owens Valley. In this letter, Mary Adams Urashima, Chair of the Historic Wintersburg Preservation Task Force, provides a strong argument against the LADWP proposal.


Mary Adams Urashima, Chair,
Historic Wintersburg Preservation Task Force
Photo courtesy Mary Adams Urashima

December 20, 2013

Los Angeles Department of Water and Power
Environmental Planning and Assessment
111 North Hope Street, Room 1044
Los Angeles, CA 90012

Re: Southern Owens Valley Solar Ranch Project Draft Environmental Impact Report (Draft EIR)

I urge you to consider alternatives to the installation of a large solar array in the Owens Valley, near Manzanar, a heritage site on the National Register of Historic Places. Please do not certify the draft EIR and declare it inadequate in its analysis of the cumulative impacts and project alternatives.

Cumulative Impacts

The draft EIR does not adequately consider state and national impacts with the loss of historic and cultural resources relating to Manzanar and the Big Pine Paiute Tribe of the Owens Valley.

The Big Pine Paiute Tribe spoke at the public hearing regarding their cultural and spiritual practices necessitating the open valley land. The Tribe already has been impacted by the 1913 construction of the aqueduct. From a documentary in production about the Paiute, Paya: “For the ancient Paiute—from Pai meaning water—water was central to both their cultural practices and sociopolitical hierarchies. Colonization during the nineteenth century and the takeover of their waterworks without regard to first-user water rights led to the displacement of the Paiute, erasure of their irrigation practices, and suppression of their customs and history.” The taking—physical or visual—of historic lands used by the Paiute will compound a century-old impact and negate the lessons that should have been learned over the past century.

“And how did they impact our culture? Oh, it devastated our culture: from having our children taken to schools outside of the valley to folks not being able to share our language with each other because that’s not the language you’re supposed to speak anymore. Our native plants—they were non-existent; we had to look for new sources of being able to feed ourselves or we had to go to the extremes to find new places where we could gather and then [when] we did do so, we had to be careful about going about it because usually it was somebody else’s property at this point.” (“A Paiute Perspective,”in ARID A Journal of Desert Art, Design and Ecology).

How remarkable it is for California to have the Paiute among us, considering the history? When there are viable alternatives with less impact on California’s first people and environment, then those alternatives should be given more weight.

The draft EIR does not consider the broader impact of the loss of cultural and historic resources to the region and to the West Coast. Currently, there are multiple Asian American heritage sites at risk in California: Manzanar due to the solar project proposal, China House in Rancho Cucamonga (proposed for demolition), Historic Wintersburg in Huntington Beach (proposed for demolition), Tule Lake Segregation Center (proposed enclosure fence, 8-feet high, 16,000-feet long), Tuna Canyon Detention Station (historic and cultural monument blocked by developer).

At the same time, the U.S. Department of the Interior announced in February 2013, a nationwide effort to identify and find ways to preserve Asian American Pacific Islander heritage sites. We are at risk of completely losing or significantly impacting these heritage sites in California, in conflict with a federal initiative.

Additionally, at Manzanar, we must recognize the importance of its surroundings as part of the historic significance. For those unjustly incarcerated there during World War II, the Owens Valley and nearby mountain ranges were the only glimpse of America they were allowed. Thousands looked out on that viewscape. Ansel Adams captured it as part of the photographic documentation of Manzanar. This viewscape is important not just to the region but to American history. It is an essential part of this heritage site that is not considered in the draft EIR.

For both the Paiute and those incarcerated at Manzanar—and their families—there is a spiritual aspect that cannot be ignored. For the Paiute, it is generations inhabiting the land and their related spiritual and cultural practices. For those at Manzanar, the only place detainees were allowed any spiritual practices were inside the armed compound behind the barbed wire fence, looking out at the landscape. These places have meaning.

It follows then that the LADWP may not have considered the potential under the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUIPA), “No government shall impose or implement a land use regulation in a manner that imposes a substantial burden on the religious exercise of a person, including a religious assembly or institution, unless the government can demonstrate that imposition of the burden on that person, assembly or institution is the least restrictive means of furthering that compelling governmental interest.” There are other alternatives that do not impose the impact or burden on the Paiute and to the families of Manzanar.

Alternatives

Viable solar installation alternatives exist in the City of Los Angeles, as reported in Empowering LA’s Solar Workforce, a study produced by the City of Los Angeles, UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation, USC Program for Environmental and Regional Equity, and others. It is a practical approach to placing solar infrastructure where it is needed and where there is a workforce to construct, operate and maintain it without adding additional impacts relating to the natural environment, and state historical and cultural resources. This provides the benefits of solar where it is needed, while adding jobs where they are needed and without adding traffic to and from the Owens Valley.

Los Angeles County could create nearly 29,000 jobs and reduce climate change–causing emissions by more than a million tons per year if just 5 percent of available rooftop space had solar panels, per the UCLA Luskin Center for Innovation and the Environmental Defense Fund. I would suggest this study represents significant new information and a viable alternative to the proposed project.

In summary, LADWP is still working on an old model of building new infrastructure on open, rural land, in the midst of an urban environment that requires a new mindset. Please consider the impacts and follow through on the Solar Workforce study to create alternatives constructing solar within the Los Angeles urban environment.

Regards,
Mary Adams Urashima
Huntington Beach, CA

Mary Adams Urashima is the creator and author of the Historic Wintersburg blog, http://historicwintersburg.blogspot.com, about Japanese pioneer history in Huntington Beach and Orange County, California. She chairs the Historic Wintersburg Preservation Task Force and her book, Historic Wintersburg in Huntington Beach, will be released by History Press in January 2014. A former journalist, she is a government affairs consultant and writer residing in Huntington Beach.

The views expressed in this story are those of the author, and are not necessarily those of the Manzanar Committee.


Community members are urged to sign an online petition opposing the LADWP proposal. To view/sign the petition on Change.org, click on: Halt LADWP’s Plan To Build A 1,200-Acre Solar Energy Generating Station Adjacent to Manzanar National Historic Site.

For more information, please call the Manzanar Committee at (323) 662-5102, or send e-mail to info@manzanarcommittee.org.

Related Stories


Creative Commons License The Manzanar Committee’s Official Blog is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License. You may copy, distribute and/or transmit any story or audio content published on this site under the terms of this license, but only if proper attribution is indicated. The full name of the author and a link back to the original article on this site are required. Photographs, graphic images, and other content not specified are subject to additional restrictions. Additional information is available at: Manzanar Committee Official Blog – Licensing and Copyright Information.

Manzanar Committee Comment Policies

17 Responses to LADWP Clinging To Old Model For Building Infrastructure: It’s Time For A Mindset Change

  1. Pingback: Petition Drive Demands Halt To LADWP’s Plan To Build Solar Energy Facility Adjacent To Manzanar | Manzanar Committee

  2. Pingback: LADWP’s Solar Ranch Proposal: “A Display Of Cultural Insensitivity To The Japanese American Community” | Manzanar Committee

  3. Pingback: NPCA Opposes LADWP’s Proposed Solar Energy Generating Station Near Manzanar | Manzanar Committee

  4. Pingback: Tule Lake Committee Calls LADWP’s Proposed Solar Ranch Adjacent to Manzanar “Inappropriate And Offensive” | Manzanar Committee

  5. Pingback: U.S. Navy Vet On LADWP’s Proposed Solar Ranch Near Manzanar: “Haven’t Japanese Americans Been Punished Enough?” | Manzanar Committee

  6. Pingback: Kizuna Speaks Out Against LADWP’s Proposed Solar Energy Generating Station Near Manzanar | Manzanar Committee

  7. Pingback: Proposed Solar Ranch Near Manzanar: Another Threat To Japanese American Historic Sites | Manzanar Committee

  8. Pingback: Manzanar Committee Launches Letter-Writing Campaign In Opposition To LADWP Solar Ranch Near Manzanar | Manzanar Committee

  9. Pingback: Manzanar Committee Co-Chair Bruce Embrey Calls On LADWP To Find Another Location For Solar Farm | Manzanar Committee

  10. Pingback: Manzanar Defiled By The DWP | Manzanar Committee

  11. Pingback: LADWP’s Southern Owens Valley Solar Ranch Is Deemed “Butchery and Rape” By Former Manzanar Prisoner | Manzanar Committee

  12. Pingback: LA Times Shows Indifference, Shortsightedness By Supporting LADWP’s Southern Owens Valley Solar Ranch | Manzanar Committee

  13. Pingback: Owens Valley Resident Criticizes LA Times’ Support Of LADWP’s Proposed Solar Facility Near Manzanar | Manzanar Committee

  14. Pingback: Muslim Public Affairs Council Opposes LADWP’s Southern Owens Valley Solar Ranch Near Manzanar | Manzanar Committee

  15. Pingback: The City Project Opposes LADWP’s Southern Owens Valley Solar Ranch Near Manzanar | Manzanar Committee

  16. Pingback: Manzanar Committee Calls On Inyo County To Shut Door On Large-Scale Renewable Energy Facilities In Owens Valley | Manzanar Committee

  17. Pingback: Manzanar Committee Denounces Inyo County Planning Commission Decision That Could Threaten Manzanar | Manzanar Committee

Please post your comment on this story below

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 145 other followers